WebMay 14, 2024 · The mean marginal bone loss was −0.24 [0.89 standard deviation (SD)] mm at 6 months and −0.51 (0.26 SD) mm at 12 months. No significant differences were observed in marginal bone changes neither between 2- and 3-mm axial abutments nor between axial and angulated abutment. WebApr 13, 2024 · Mean marginal bone loss was assessed using standard periapical radiographs immediately after surgery and at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month follow-up examinations.
Evaluation of the implant stability and the marginal bone level changes
WebMay 6, 2024 · Abstract This study compared two modalities, crestal ridge splitting (CRS) and Osseodensification (OD) concerning implant stability, marginal bone level, and bone density. 20 patients were... WebApr 15, 2024 · The mean marginal bone level at the implant level was 0.12 ± 0.23, 0.35 ± 0.43, and 0.47 ± 0.47 mm at the SSS, baseline, and the 1–1.5-year follow-up, respectively. Most changes occurred at the implant's distal site. bpbd3s accessories
(PDF) The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the ...
WebFeb 2, 2024 · The marginal bone level (MBL) and periodontal parameters were evaluated in a cohort prospective 4-year clinical study. Methods: A total of 41 implants were placed in 36 healthy consecutive patients (16 males, 20 females, mean age 60 ± 9 years). Tapered tissue level implants, characterized by a 2.0 mm laser-microtextured neck, were used … WebJan 1, 2010 · This study suggested that marginal bone level alterations could be related to the extent of implant/abutment mismatching. Marginal bone levels were better maintained at implants restored... WebMarginal bone level, probing depth, keratinized gingival width, and bleeding on probing were assessed at the time of implant placement (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2) after surgery. There was no significant difference in hard and soft tissue parameters between the grafted and nongrafted sites at any of the durations (P < 0.05). Bone level ... gym proforma